Easter 6A

It’s that time again, and this week I’m torn between two lectionary paths.

The first idea that came to me is to preach intra-biblically using Acts 17:22-31 and John 14:15-21. Both texts seem to me to be about questions of who gets to know God and how one gets to know God. In the gospel passage, the way to know God is through a bond of love for Jesus, mediated by the Spirit, and carried out by following Jesus’ commandments. Lots of interesting Trinitarian possibilities there, although I’m not sure I’ll go wandering down that road this Sunday. Jesus is talking to a group of his close disciples about how they will maintain this relationship with holiness after he is gone, and that shapes what he tells them: they will always know him by the presence of the Advocate and through their continued acts of love.

Paul in Acts is going in a different direction, but he’s also speaking to a group of people who are deeply interested in how they get to know the divine. They have objects everywhere to represent deities and give them images of divine power with which they can interact. But Paul latches onto one particular object: an empty altar to an unknown god. This God, Paul says, cannot be seen or understood in material objects. This God is known…when God chooses to be known? Through the desire to seek God? When we grope at and sometimes manage to grasp God? Or simply through living and moving and having our being in this God? Maybe some of all the above.

The two texts also share a common theme of God inhabiting us, which is a concept I find simultaneously comforting, inspiring, and creepy. It’s the creepy aspect that made me wonder if perhaps the other passages might bring me better possibilities this week, which brings us to option two: 1 Peter 3 with backup from Psalm 66.

Both of these passages are about suffering and trial, so if I preach about this, my new congregation will probably start to wonder if I ever preach about anything that isn’t a little depressing. But if I preach from these texts, it will likely be to give some corrective to the ways that the church often talks about being blessed in suffering.

First of all, this is specifically talking about suffering as a result of keeping Christian faith in the face of persecution. Actual persecution, like being arrested, beaten, tortured, or killed. It is not talking about the current persecution complex of a certain arm of American Christianity, which believes itself to be halfway up Golgotha when Starbucks dares to make plain red cups or children go through a day in public school without being required to pray.

Second, it’s not talking about the sanctity of all suffering. It is not instructing people to stay with their abusive spouses, for example. It is not saying that your poverty, or illness, or marginalization, or oppression is some warped gift from God that you should quietly endure. Jesus understanding suffering, or identifying with your suffering, may be a comfort when you are suffering. Enduring suffering may in fact shape you as a person in ways that turn out to be positive. But please for the love of all that is good, let us stop telling people that they just need to understand that their suffering is really a blessing.

If I go the second route, I’ll be pulling in some womanist theology, much of which comes down HARD on the notion that suffering is redemptive.

So, those are my initial thoughts on two very different possibilities for this week. Preachers, what are you preaching? Hearers and participants in the Word, what is speaking to you?


2 Comments Add yours

  1. treelady13 says:

    Stacey, next Sunday I would like to hear about the ways of knowing God (Acts and John). For several years, I have felt and am feeling led by Spirit to a renewed closeness with God, a closeness that is richly nurtured by my church worship and community. It’s very uplifting for me. So, yes, this is what I would like to hear from you on the Sixth Sunday of Easter. Sequoia Powers-Griffin

  2. aboksu says:

    Acts 17:22-34 paired with Psalm 113 Title: “Describing the Indescribable” Preliminary Outline
    In general, I don’t preach quite so “biblicaly” or find my outline in the text, but I’m doing both on the 21st.

    (Bait Question) Think of and then describe the flavor of your favorite food. Can’t do it.
    Paul’s method in Athens was to observe context, find connections, acknowledge existing
    consistencies and to argue starting from there.
    Transition: Why have this argument here? Because Paul, a Pharisee by upbringing, was situated
    at Hellenism Central on this day.
    I. Describing God: In relationship to the cosmos (vs 24-25)
    Transition: The Relationship of God to Humanity (v 26)
    II Describing God in Purpose and Presence (vs 27-28a and Ps 113:7-9)
    Transition: The relationship of humanity to God (v 28b)
    III Describing God’s form and intention (vv 29-31)
    Conclusion: Some honest responses (vv 32-34)
    curiosity without commitment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s